﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">INFORMATICA</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>Informatica</journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn pub-type="epub">1822-8844</issn>
			<issn pub-type="ppub">0868-4952</issn>
			<issn-l>0868-4952</issn-l>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Vilnius University Institute of Mathematics and Informatics</publisher-name>
				<publisher-loc>Akademijos 4, LT-08663 Vilnius, Lithuania</publisher-loc>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">INFO590</article-id>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15388/Informatica.2005.095</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Research Article</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Hierarchical Decision Making Framework for Evaluation and Improvement of Composite Systems (Example for Building)</article-title>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Levin</surname>
						<given-names>Mark Sh.</given-names>
					</name>
					<email xlink:href="mailto:mslevin@acm.org">mslevin@acm.org</email>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="j_info590_aff_001">a</xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Danieli</surname>
						<given-names>Moshe A.</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="j_info590_aff_002">b</xref>
				</contrib>
				<aff id="j_info590_aff_001">
					<label>a</label>Institute for Information Transmission Problems, <institution>Russian Academy of Sciences</institution>, 19 Bolshoj Karetny lane, Moscow, 127994, <country>Russia</country>
				</aff>
				<aff id="j_info590_aff_002">
					<label>b</label>
					<institution>The College of Judea &amp; Samaria</institution>, Ariel 44837, <country>Israel</country>
				</aff>
			</contrib-group>
			<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
				<year>2005</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>16</volume>
			<issue>2</issue>
			<fpage>213</fpage>
			<lpage>240</lpage>
			<history>
				<date date-type="received">
					<day>1</day>
					<month>6</month>
					<year>2004</year>
				</date>
			</history>
			<permissions>
				<copyright-statement>© 2005 Institute of Mathematics and Informatics, Vilnius</copyright-statement>
				<copyright-year>2005</copyright-year>
				<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
					<license-p>Open access article under the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">CC BY</ext-link> license.</license-p>
				</license>
			</permissions>
			<abstract>
				<p>The article describes a hierarchical decision making framework for the evaluation and improvement/redesign of composite systems. The framework is based on Hierarchical Morphological Multicriteria Design (HMMD) and corresponding morphological clique problem which realize “partitioning/synthesis macroheuristic”. The system evaluation process consists in hierarchical integration of expert judgment (as ordinal estimates): a method of integration tables or the above-mentioned morphological approach. As a result, ordinal multi-state classification is realized. The system improvement/redesign process is examined as the selection and planning of redesign operations while taking into account operations attributes (e.g., required resources, effectiveness) and binary relations (<italic>equivalence</italic>, <italic>complementarity</italic>, <italic>precedence</italic>) on the operation sets. For modeling the system improvement process several combinatorial optimization models are used (knapsack problem, multiple choice problem, etc.) including HMMD.</p>
				<p>The suggested approach is illustrated by realistic numerical example for two-floor building. This applied problem is examined from the viewpoint of earthquake engineering.</p>
			</abstract>
			<kwd-group>
				<label>Key words</label>
				<kwd>engineering design</kwd>
				<kwd>system analysis</kwd>
				<kwd>composite systems</kwd>
				<kwd>evaluation</kwd>
				<kwd>improvement</kwd>
				<kwd>multicriteria decision making</kwd>
				<kwd>combinatorial optimization</kwd>
				<kwd>morphological analysis</kwd>
				<kwd>macroheuristic</kwd>
				<kwd>civil engineering</kwd>
				<kwd>earthquake engineering</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
</article>